<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Big Blog &#187; communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bigpoz.com/category/communication/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bigpoz.com</link>
	<description>We talk about everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>N Series Mobile Phones: Technology to the Max</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2010/07/n-series-mobile-phones-technology-to-the-max/1002</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2010/07/n-series-mobile-phones-technology-to-the-max/1002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion Statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stereo Fm Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2010/07/n-series-mobile-phones-technology-to-the-max/1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ... , new ideas. The boom in the mobile market has helped us in more ways than one. We have not only got <b>multi</b>-purpose mobile phones but also seen the entry of some really beautiful and fascinating devices that can uplift our fashion statement. <br />

 ... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a world without mobile phones! Tough! right? In the present scenario, <a href="http://www.3contractmobilephones.co.uk">mobile phones</a> have occupied a very distinct position among the tech savvy persons who need everything at their fingertips. Tremendous growth in the telecom sector has facilitated us with new technologies, new ideas. The boom in the mobile market has helped us in more ways than one. We have not only got multi-purpose mobile phones but also seen the entry of some really beautiful and fascinating devices that can uplift our fashion statement. </p>
<p>As far as the popularity of mobile brands is concerned, Nokia, the Finnish mobile giant stills rules the world. <a href="http://www.3contractmobilephones.co.uk/nokia_mobile_phones.asp">Nokia mobile phones</a> are well known for their reliability and user-friendliness. The <span id="more-1002"></span> aggressive launch of Nokia N-Series mobile phones has taken the mobile market by storm. Initially, Nokia brought N71, N72, N70, N80, N91 and Nokia N93 into the market and received huge response from customers world over. â€œSee New, Hear New, Feel Newâ€-has become a way of life now. Truly speaking, Nokia N-Series mobile phones have given a new name to the way people talk. </p>
<p>In the last few months some more N-Series mobile phones have been launched. These are the Nokia N91 8GB, Nokia N93i and the powerful <a href="http://www.3contractmobilephones.co.uk/Phone_Deal.asp?Ph=Nokia--N95">Nokia N95</a>. As a Nokia trademark, all these mobile phones are endowed with some eye-catching features which are more than enough to give other mobiles ( handsets manufactured by other companies) a run for their money. Features like high resolution built-in camera, dedicated music player supporting number of music files, stereo FM radio, visual radio, advanced 3G connectivity, Bluetooth, GPRS, EDGE, WLAN, full Web Browser etc. are all incorporated in the latest Nokia N-Series mobile phones. All these phones run on the highly appreciated Symbian Operating System. Get any of these powerful devices and begin to see life from a different angle-an angle full of fun and frolic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2010/07/n-series-mobile-phones-technology-to-the-max/1002/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water-bucket or Pipeline Builder? What Type of Salesperson are You?</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2009/04/water-bucket-or-pipeline-builder-what-type-of-salesperson-are-you/4212</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2009/04/water-bucket-or-pipeline-builder-what-type-of-salesperson-are-you/4212#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stainless Steel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Bucket]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2009/04/water-bucket-or-pipeline-builder-what-type-of-salesperson-are-you/4212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ...  fulfill a market need, and a long range view of where you want to be. When you decide to become a pipeline builder instead of a <b>bucket</b> carrier, your mind will explode with creative ways to make it so, but it will still require a ton of hard work to  ... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are in outside sales in what is known as a â€œhunterâ€ position, you are either a water bucket carrying salesperson, or you are a pipeline building salesperson. Find out why you need to identify which one you are, and which one you want to be!</p>
<p>Robert Kyosaki tells a great story about a village that had a serious water issue. They did not receive enough rainfall to provide water for the villageâ€™s daily needs, and the river was a couple of miles away and highly inconvenient for the village people to go to every day. The mayor decided once and for all to put an end to the problem. He would put the job of bringing water <span id="more-4212"></span> from the river to the village up for bid, and they would outsource the project to the winning bidder. </p>
<p>Well, as luck would have it, two men put in their bid, and they were both awarded the project. The mayor figured a little competition never hurt anyone, and they would also always be sure that they would have enough water. Immediately, man number one went out, bought two water buckets, and started carrying buckets of fresh water early in the morning back and forth from the river to the village 6 days a week. He took Sundays off, so on that day the village did not have water. </p>
<p>Man number two did not buy buckets or start carrying water at all. In fact, no one was sure what he was up to. This made man number one quite happy, as he was earning all of the money as the sole source of water for the village. It was terrific! Man number one continued to carry buckets day after day, all day long under the hot summer sun, and he made a darn decent living doing so.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, man number two had gone to work gathering investors, developing a business plan, and received permits to build a stainless steel pipeline from the river to the village. Once complete, he was able to offer an endless supply of water to the village 7 days a week that was cleaner than what man number one was able to provide for 10% of man number oneâ€™s price! Competition had arrived with a fury!</p>
<p>The example was told to Kyosaki by his â€œrich dadâ€ to illustrate a point on work and investing, but doesnâ€™t it also apply to you in the world of competitive sales? In the past 10 years, anyone in sales can tell you the gameâ€™s rules have changed, and they have changed with a fury!</p>
<p>If you are mindlessly cold calling day after day, with no long range plan on how to put your prospecting on â€œauto-pilotâ€, how are you any different than the guy carrying two buckets back and forth every day from the river? How can you continue to compete with a stainless steel pipeline with your two buckets as you get older and your back starts to ache from the unending physical toil?  As the odds of you succeeding against those with a long range plan become slimmer and slimmer, how do you get out of â€œbucket carryingâ€ mode and make your own pipeline before itâ€™s too late? How can you possibly avoid burnout? How will you continue to compete in the new digital age with ancient methods of â€œwater transfer?â€</p>
<p>You canâ€™t. And, you wonâ€™t. If you do continue on the road of carrying buckets day after day, the inevitable end will be sales burnout, ending up broke, bitter, and completely confused as to â€œwhat happened.â€ Even as you work right now, some of your competition is in the process of building stainless steel pipelines of new clients. And some of those customers used to be yours. How do they do it? What are they doing? How did they know? But perhaps most importantly, how can you do it? </p>
<p>The answer to the last question is different for every field and every industry, but yet the answer is the same in concept. Itâ€™s the power of leverage. How does the pipeline carry more water than the individual? It is a structure that took a lot of time and effort to build, that works 24 hours a day even when you donâ€™t, required a vision for the future, and it fulfilled a need. You need to repeat that exact same process in order to create your own pipeline. If you are not in an industry where that is possible, you may consider finding one where it is. Carrying buckets long term will almost guarantee sales burnout. </p>
<p>When you take a look at your industry, there is already someone who is building a â€œbetter mousetrapâ€ and is in process of building their own â€œstainless steel pipelineâ€ for finding qualified customers. It is never too late to catch up. But do not be fooled, there is no shortcut in the process. There are hours of hard work involved, tremendous amounts of planning to fulfill a market need, and a long range view of where you want to be. When you decide to become a pipeline builder instead of a bucket carrier, your mind will explode with creative ways to make it so, but it will still require a ton of hard work to get there. The sooner you can identify where you are in the process, the sooner you can begin to work towards where you want to be. Eventually, you should be able to put your prospecting on auto-pilot. Best wishes in your pipeline building!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2009/04/water-bucket-or-pipeline-builder-what-type-of-salesperson-are-you/4212/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Unproductive Communication Costing your Business Part of an Estimated Â£7.8 Billion?</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/is-unproductive-communication-costing-your-business-part-of-an-estimated-a7-8-billion/1357</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/is-unproductive-communication-costing-your-business-part-of-an-estimated-a7-8-billion/1357#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone Number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Service Perspective]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/is-unproductive-communication-costing-your-business-part-of-an-estimated-a7-8-billion/1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ...  and cheaper. If your business does not keep up, you can be sure your competition will.<br />

<br />

Neil Sherring of <b>Windsor</b> Telecom, the UK's second largest provider of 0845 numbers, deals with thousands of businesses who are moving towards an  ... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like people. Although technology has made it easier for us to communicate, find information and shop, the truth is people like doing business with people and, on the whole, business transactions still predominantly take place over the telephone. Is your business missing revenue-generating calls?</p>
<p>Whatever the size of your business, giving your potential and existing customers a simple and reliable means to reach you via the telephone is arguably the most important aspect of your overall business, particularly from a customer service perspective.</p>
<p>We all know how annoying it is to phone a company and get no reply or be poorly taken care of. Technology has fuelled our appetite for information and as such consumers demand products <span id="more-1357"></span> and services quicker and cheaper. If your business does not keep up, you can be sure your competition will.</p>
<p>Neil Sherring of Windsor Telecom, the UK&#8217;s second largest provider of 0845 numbers, deals with thousands of businesses who are moving towards an enhanced and simple approach to telephone communication and customer service. &#8220;The truth is if potential customers can&#8217;t get hold of you, they&#8217;ll try your competitors and if you fail to answer the phone when your existing customers call, you&#8217;ll lose them before you know it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Neil&#8217;s top five tips for enhancing your marketing, customer service and call management:</p>
<p>1. Location, Location, Location (of your phone number!).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s hundreds of free places you can display your phone number, yet we are all guilty of ignoring how important this is. Business cards, leaflets, online directories, shop fronts, uniforms, vehicles, letterheads, fax headers, the list goes on. For example, do you display your phone number on every page of your website or just under &#8216;contact us&#8217;? If customers see a phone number they are more inclined to call. Don&#8217;t miss any opportunity to display your phone number.</p>
<p>2. Put yourself in your customers shoes.</p>
<p>70% of people hang up the phone on voicemail. We all know how hard it is to answer the phone every time, but any missed call could be a missed sale, so make it your priority to answer all your calls. This doesn&#8217;t mean you have to stop doing everything and sit by the phone all day, it just means you have to be on the ball about your call management and perhaps invest in a solution. These range from effective voicemail, online time and day management of your calls, to impressive bespoke solutions. Do your research, evaluate your options and most importantly take action &#8211; you&#8217;ll wish you had done it sooner.</p>
<p>3. Your phone number is king.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.windsor-telecom.co.uk/0845-local-rate-numbers.php">0845 numbers</a> quite simply transform your business. According to an OfCom report 83% of UK businesses say their NGNs are important to their organisation (August 2005). There is no doubt that a 0845 number is professional, easier to remember and gives a national presence. Normal landline numbers don&#8217;t have these valuable features and don&#8217;t stand out amongst the rest. A great phone number is central to your corporate identity and a gateway to other powerful benefits, such as call statistics.</p>
<p>4. &#8220;May I ask where you heard about us&#8221;.</p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t believe how many people don&#8217;t ask this question and it costs nothing! If you know you get most of your calls from online advertising then you can be sure that if you spend more on that you&#8217;ll get more calls and make more money. If you fail to do this you could very easily be wasting hundreds of pounds.</p>
<p>5. Information at your finger tips.</p>
<p>The more you know about your customers the more effectively you can sell to them. How amazing would it be to know who calls you and where they call from, when you get the most calls and how many times you miss a call etc? You could very easily advertise in the right location, manage your time, working day or staff more effectively and never miss another sales enquiry. Businesses do this everyday with call statistics packages. From &#8216;one man bands&#8217; to corporate giants, it is without out doubt the easiest way to get a better understanding of your market, manage your business productively and get a competitive edge. Information is everything these days and these give you it at the touch of a button.</p>
<p>In a world dominated by technological development and wireless, the good old fashioned telephone is often neglected by businesses, but remains the primary customer channel. Max Atkinson, visiting professor at <a href="http://www.henleymc.ac.uk/">Henley Management College</a> and author of Lend Me Your Ears (Vermillion 2004) estimates that unproductive communication costs UK businesses an estimated Â£7.8 billion each year.</p>
<p>Your business doesn&#8217;t have to be part of this Â£7.8 billion loss, particularly if you follow the five simple steps above. It&#8217;s all about being proactive and thinking more about the way your customers contact you. There&#8217;s a wealth of advice and an excellent range of cost effective products and services out there, which will help you generate more enquiries and boost customer retention.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchwarp.com/About44320.htm">Andrew Regan</a> is a freelance online journalist who travels extensively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/is-unproductive-communication-costing-your-business-part-of-an-estimated-a7-8-billion/1357/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview With Michael D. Sellers, Who Produced</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/interview-with-michael-d-sellers-who-produced/6217</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/interview-with-michael-d-sellers-who-produced/6217#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amount Of Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Ramifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wife Murder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/interview-with-michael-d-sellers-who-produced/6217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interview With Michael D. Sellers, Who Produced "Karla" for MovieBank <b>Studios</b><br />
The following is an interview with Michael D. Sellers, who produced (with the help of intrepid moviebank <b>studios</b> investors) the controversial film "Karla" for  ... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interview With Michael D. Sellers, Who Produced &#8220;Karla&#8221; for MovieBank Studios<br />
The following is an interview with Michael D. Sellers, who produced (with the help of intrepid moviebank studios investors) the controversial film &#8220;Karla&#8221; for MovieBank Studios. The film depicts the crimes of the notorious Canadian husband and wife murder team of Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo. Its release in Canada was met with howls of protest from Canadian politicians and media outlets.</p>
<p>Q: This is undoubtedly one of the most controversial, violent stories in modern Canadian history, and it is essentially still unfolding. Karla Homolka, who was just released from prison a few months ago, was still in prison when you began making this film. Did you ever <span id="more-6217"></span> feel <br />
you were making the film &#8220;too soon&#8221;?</p>
<p>A: Well, when the idea of doing a project on Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo was first brought to me by director Joel Bender, it was January 2004 and &#8220;Monster&#8221; was in the theaters. The murders in that movie took place at about the same time that these do  so initially, no, we thought plenty of time had passed. Indeed, now, as the film is being released &#8212; the murders themselves are 15 years in the past. But there <br />
are unique aspects to this case which have kept it alive in unusual ways &#8212; Karla&#8217;s plea bargain and resulting short prison stay, her release this past summer, the court overturning the post-release restrictions. All of these things have kept the story alive and made it seem like the crimes were committed yesterday. But it&#8217;s been fifteen years, and we think that is a reasonable, and respectful amount of time.</p>
<p>Q: You did research a great deal about the legal ramifications of telling this story, and were in close communication with representatives of the victims&#8217; families. Could you discuss that process a bit and what the outcome was of your discussions?</p>
<p>A: From the beginning, Tim Danson&#8211;the attorney who represents the victims&#8217; families&#8211;said that the families respected our right to make the movie and would only oppose it if the film contained depictions of their daughters which could reasonably be construed as either disrespectful or pornographic. Tim defined pornographic as nudity or simulated sex on screen by the actresses portraying the victims. We never intended to include either of those elements in the film, so there was really no problem. When we finished the edit, I took a copy to Toronto and showed it to Tim, and they concurred that it was not pornographic and they would not oppose the release of the film. Misha Collins and Laura Prepon in &#8220;Karla&#8221;</p>
<p>Q: There were reports that you removed some scenes at the families&#8217; request.</p>
<p>A: We removed 8 frames &#8212; 1/3 of one second &#8212; of a long shot across a room because Tim felt that if you played it frame by frame on a DVD you might detect a flash of nudity which was not detectable when played at normal speed. We agreed to do this. That was the only change. You have to remember &#8212; there had been an ongoing and productive dialogue up to the point where we showed the movie, and that dialogue did affect the edit in certain ways&#8211;not in the form of demands from the family, but just from dialogue and discussion. So there were some changes, but not as a result of the screening.</p>
<p>
Q: What kind of changes?</p>
<p>A: Well, Tim was able to provide additional background on some of the sensitivities of the families, things that really were important to them, <br />
and we took that into consideration. One example would be the issue of Leslie Mahaffey being locked out of her house, and that playing a role in her getting accosted by Bernardo. We downplayed that aspect because it&#8217;s a sore point for the family and not critical in any way to our story.</p>
<p>Q: What was the point-of-view from which you wanted to present the film?</p>
<p>A: Point of view in this film is interesting, and challenging. On the one hand, it&#8217;s Karla&#8217;s story. We meet her at the beginning as she is about to undergo an extended psychiatric evaluation in the fall of 2000, eight years into her 12-year prison term. We see all of the <br />
events in the past&#8211;everything from the early scenes with Paul through the crimes and eventually a little bit of the trial&#8211;from her point of view. But that point of view is repeatedly challenged by the psychiatrist who is interviewing her. He doesn&#8217;t &#8220;buy into&#8221; her story, but rather tries to peel away the layers of the onion, exposing Karla&#8217;s attempts at &#8220;spin&#8221;, forcing Karla to acknowledge things that she doesn&#8217;t want to acknowledge.</p>
<p>Q: Did your approach to the story evolve over time?</p>
<p>A: Yes and no. I always felt that it was Karla&#8217;s story, not Paul&#8217;s. But I think, as we got deeper into it, we began to understand the ramifications of this on more levels, and that led to some changes.</p>
<p>Q: Such as.?</p>
<p>A: Such as the decision to use the interviews with the psychiatrist as a wraparound. We basically felt that yes, it needs to be Karla&#8217;s story, but you need a counterpoint&#8211;you can&#8217;t let her just tell it her way without any counter-argument being presented. <br />
It felt like it would be irresponsible and misleading to not create a &#8220;dissenting voice&#8221; to her story.</p>
<p>Q: What problems &#8212; logistical, legal, ethical &#8212; did you encounter in commencing production?</p>
<p>A: Logistically, we were shooting Los Angeles for Canada, which is a switch since usually it&#8217;s the other way around. We did find houses which closely matched the actual houses in St. Catherines, but we had to be careful&#8211;too much panning around with the camera and palm trees <br />
would be visible. And red tile roofs, things like that. We thought originally that we would go up and shoot some second unit in Canada&#8211;but after the filming was complete and we had been editing for awhile, it began to seem less important because the story is so much about this kind of hermetically sealed world in which these two people live. It almost felt like attempt to bring in &#8220;local color&#8221; from Canada would <br />
just confuse matters, rather than add value.</p>
<p>Legally, there were a number of issues. The most significant one, and the one that affects the story the most, is that we could not depict anyone in the Homolka family other than Karla, a convicted felon, and Tammy, who is deceased. That posed problems but we worked through it, without, I think, compromising the story.</p>
<p>Ethically, it was a matter of constantly remembering, and reminding everyone on the show, that this is not a thriller, this really happened. We felt that this imposed a very strict burden on us to be accurate. No flights of fancy&#8211;just try to tell the truth as we understood it. <br />
And that involves a lot more than the simple facts of the story. The simple facts&#8211;this happened, and then this happened, and then this happened&#8211;are meaningless unless we are able to supply insight into the &#8220;why&#8221; of these things. Why did Karla let Paul talk her into the <br />
rape of Tammy? Why did she stay with him? Why, when he brought Leslie Mahaffey home, did she join him? Why did she go out on the street and help him abduct Kristin French? Why did she finally turn on him? The film tries, to the very best of our ability, to deliver meaningful insight into these questions. We felt that, ethically, the film would only have value if it did this&#8211;that we only had a right to make it if we were doing our best to shed light on these questions.</p>
<p>Q: Among the aspects that seem to have transfixed the media and the public with this case are how ordinary, attractive and wholesome Karla Homolka and Paul Bernardo seemed. How did you approach casting these &#8220;couple-next-door&#8221; killers?</p>
<p>A: In a way, it would have been much easier to cast a &#8220;killer couple&#8221; who were in some way overtly creepy. Finding people to play that kind of role is relatively easy. But we had to find actors who could be convincing&#8211;as Paul and Karla were&#8211;as &#8220;regular, normal&#8221; people, and who could also be convincing as the killers that they ultimately became. I had known Misha Collins from his previous work and asked him to read <br />
for the part &#8212; which he did, along with hundreds of others. In the end, he was the hands-down choice purely based on the merit of his audition. Laura Prepon was another story. I don&#8217;t think any of us would have thought of red-headed Donna from &#8220;That 70&#8217;s Show&#8221; as the choice for Karla &#8212; but her manager saw the script and sent it to her, and she liked it and came in to read for it. As soon as she came in and we talked, then <br />
read a little bit, I knew we had our Karla. She had a tremendous grasp of the character and an ability to bring out all sides of Karla.</p>
<p>Q: Some members of the Canadian government have called for a ban or boycott of the film. Your response?</p>
<p>A: The Canadian government, particularly the Ontario government, are viewed by many as having dropped the ball in the matter of achieving justice in this situation, and they clearly have a deeply felt (and politically understandable) need to show continued concern and vigilance. I&#8217;m not a Canadian so I don&#8217;t really want to comment on what crosses the line between legitimate vigilance and intrusive &#8220;big brother&#8221;-ness. That&#8217;s for Canadians to sort out. But I do understand where they are coming from. My only real complaint is that they made these calls without <br />
having seen the film &#8212; or without even having read any legitimate reviews of the film. I would note that all of these calls that you&#8217;re referring to happened before any of the reviews came out. Since the first reviews did appear in August &#8212; there have been no more such calls from government figures, and the families have also publicly stated that while they do not endorse any movie about the crimes, they will not <br />
oppose the release of this one.</p>
<p>Q: You&#8217;ve said &#8212; to paraphrase &#8212; that this film is not a referendum on Karla&#8217;s guilt or innocence, but rather an exploration of her character. <br />
Could you please elaborate?</p>
<p>A: I think there may be a tendency in Canada for people, when considering Karla, to be overwhelmed by the notion of what she became&#8211;Paul&#8217;s killer accomplice&#8211;and to forget that this is, indeed, what she became&#8211;not what she was when they met. When they met, he was already the Scarborough rapist but she didn&#8217;t know that, and she was a high school senior with no history of illegal activities whatsoever. So how did this girl, a high school senior from a responsible, working family, fall in with Paul, and how and why did she make one decision after another that took her down a very dark road. We really felt that exploring that journey, rather than overtly judging Karla, was what the story was about. Everyone, even killers, have a point of view. They don&#8217;t&#8217; start out as killers&#8211;they become killers. It is this &#8220;becoming&#8221; part of it that fascinated me. It seemed to me at the time we were studying and writing the story, that Karla started from what was for her a &#8220;normal&#8221; place, then made once decision after another, each one of which created a &#8220;new normal&#8221;, and which made it easier for the next bad decision to happen. If you look at it in totality it&#8217;s incomprehensible &#8211;but if you break it down into each step, each decision &#8212; then we, the film-makers, have a chance to deliver meaningful insight about it. That&#8217;s our job &#8212; to deliver meaningful insight. Audiences will judge KARLA, the film, but I really believe they will do so, after watching it, from a position of much greater understanding of the <br />
factors involved as a result of having seen the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/12/interview-with-michael-d-sellers-who-produced/6217/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Auditioning for Voice Actors in the new era &#8211; the best way to ensure more bookings.</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/03/auditioning-for-voice-actors-in-the-new-era-the-best-way-to-ensure-more-bookings/5031</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/03/auditioning-for-voice-actors-in-the-new-era-the-best-way-to-ensure-more-bookings/5031#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Basis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/03/auditioning-for-voice-actors-in-the-new-era-the-best-way-to-ensure-more-bookings/5031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ... too. You wouldn't believe some of <b>the</b> stuff people send out...American Idol all over again. </p>
<p>Take a look at your surroundings in <b>the</b> <b>studio</b>. Anything that makes noise at your place is subject to sensitive ears when you send it out. <b>The</b> people ... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you follow trends, you can tell that the Voice Over Casting business is turning to online sources. At the very least, it is becoming the most economical way for new talent to break into the market and get heard. Many of these talents venture into the market with home made everything; demos, packaging, websites, commercial copy, studio setups and the list goes on. They send out home made CD&#8217;s that they made in their home made studio, labeled with their home made labels and promoted on their home made websites. Not to frown on this, because it is the way that almost everyone gets started. Problem is now&#8230; EVERYBODY wants to be a voice guy or girl, which means <span id="more-5031"></span> the talent pool, or somewhat stagnant water for that matter, has gotten quite muddy with demo after demo after demo on the market from talent after talent after talent.. You get my point I guess.</p>
<p>A lot of these guys and girls are filtered out through the cost of doing business, and many get discouraged after a few attempts at getting hired, and they too fall by the wayside. Which is good for all of us that choose on a daily basis to remain in the game and continue to deal with the rejection and other headaches that come with the business. What it does leave behind is the chaff of those who have moved on to greener pastures. Producer&#8217;s shelves continue to be lined with demo tapes and CD&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been in a lot of agencies and it is almost laughable what some people will send to agents trying to drum up business. All one has to do is watch the new season of American Idol to witness how people throw half hearted attempts at getting to the big leagues. At times all of us are guilty of it. I noticed a while back that I myself had gotten &#8220;a little lazy&#8221; in the audition process. After 10 years, you tend to develop a routine where by you do everything the same. I sat back and took a good look at how I was physically positioned when submitting online auditions. There I was at the mixing console in the studio, sitting in front of the mic I usually use for coaching, talkback, ISDN and booth recording sessions.The mic stand as it turns out was set to low, I was slumped over in my chair, leaning to the right a little, and doing little more than muttering my way through the auditions. Then with little concern, I would do some basic editing to the file and ship it off. I had over time, ceased putting the right amount of effort into the auditions. I was still doing a good job. Question is, was I doing the best job I could. The answer was no. I could certainly do a lot better. I began by rearranging the mic so I had to stand up to use it. No more of this sitting down and firing them off like they didn&#8217;t matter. I stand up for all of the other production I do, why shouldn&#8217;t I put just as much effort into the auditions? That&#8217;s a pretty easy one to answer&#8230; Auditioning is tiresome and boring. The only thing that makes it tolerable is the idea you might land something out of the deal. And your spirit sure gets renewed every time you do. </p>
<p>Auditioning is also one of those things we have to do in order to get any work, so after a while it becomes like taking out the trash. If we don&#8217;t do it no one will &#8211; and as long as no one is watching, we can let it pile up for a while. What happens after it sits there for a while? It starts to stink. Much the same way our auditions do after we begin to see them as a chore, or something &#8220;that is beneath us&#8221; because we have been doing this long enough and we know what we are doing.</p>
<p>What a poor attitude to have. Each audition is a new opportunity to be reborn. We can get up, sit up straight, (or in my case stand up) and go after the new job lead with some real gusto. I have gotten some auditions into the studio in the past month or so where you can tell that the talent just didn&#8217;t care, or thought the job was beneath them for some reason. So why even bother applying? If you aren&#8217;t going to give it your all, why even take the time? Some of these auditions were mixed up with younger talents that were trying way too hard to sound &#8220;Cool&#8221;. </p>
<p>You can hear it in every aspect of the audio they sent over. Straining and pushing themselves to sound like who knows what. The one thing they accomplish is sounding like anyone but themselves. But compared to the experienced talent that &#8220;Phoned In&#8221; their read, the two demos sound strikingly familiar to one another. In what way you ask? They just weren&#8217;t right. Out of the 100 or so submissions I received, almost half of them hit the round file (trash) due to audio quality alone. If they were sending junk like that out in an attempt to get a gig, what nightmares would I have to deal with if I had them produce the audio in their own studio? Of the other 60% or so, some of them nailed it. Just plain old nailed it. They got the read, they got the voice, and they got the interpretation. It made it hard to decide who to pick. </p>
<p>Then there were the Shatners of the bunch &#8211; That is the self deprecating Shatner I speak of. They just pushed too hard, or tried to do something that was totally out of their range or experimental. Auditions should never be &#8220;Experimental&#8221;. At times it was just a little issue that could be overlooked if there wasn&#8217;t anyone else to choose from, but in this case there were other talents that hit the nail on the head. Other times it was glaring; some talents chose to put their own words into the script because they didn&#8217;t like the way it was written, then there were the English professors who took it upon themselves to correct us as if we were the writers of the copy. I mean they actually took time at the beginning of their read to say, &#8220;Oh, and by the way ______ is not the correct use of the word&#8221; or &#8220;this part of the script really needs some work.&#8221; Absolute no-nos. I don&#8217;t care who you are.. The words on the page are the words the client wants to hear. You will never, ever get hired if you think you can get away with scorning the people who wrote the script. At least we wont hire you. It&#8217;s not to say if someone had the tact to call on the phone and start with &#8220;I have some concerns about the copy.&#8221; they would be turned away never to hear from us again.</p>
<p>At least then, the producer or client may be willing to listen. Sometimes, talents have pointed out some really good stuff, and they get thanked for it. But anyone who thinks they can stand up on the mountain top like some sort of Shakespearean authority and dictate to clients and producers what is and isn&#8217;t right has got another thing coming. Hopefully, it&#8217;s a habit not too many people have.. Needless to say, their demos ended up in the round file too. </p>
<p>Then there were the ones that made you laugh. Once again, think of American Idol&#8230; Auditions where Mommy is in the kitchen on her laptop with a $5 computer microphone and little Johnny is riding his Big Wheel around on the linoleum floor and little Jenny is yelling at Johnny in the background. In the middle of her read, mommy turns around to shoosh her kids &#8220;Would you all quiet down, mommy&#8217;s trying to do something here..&#8221; I kid you not; she actually left that part in the audition. </p>
<p>This would be the &#8220;Chaff&#8221; I mentioned earlier. Just people who had no business even trying but they continue to try anyway. There were a few of these auditions. They were remarkable! It&#8217;s the only time I&#8217;ve had a client rolling around in tears on my studio floor, and if you&#8217;ve been to the studio, you know there isn&#8217;t enough room to roll around. (One quick note to all those who submitted your demos to the studio last month: This article was not inspired by any of your work. It is referring to completely unrelated demos submitted by people actually auditioning for a job we did. Just wanted to let you know.. Thanks)</p>
<p>The point I am trying to make is this: There is a lot of competition for voice work out there. Some of the best talents in the world apply for the same jobs the rest of us do. As well as do some of the worst. We need to find a way to make sure that we don&#8217;t resemble the latter while we strive to become the best we can be. New talent and old alike are guilty of not putting their best foot forward on occasion. It is in these instances the good VO&#8217;s sound bad and that in turn makes the bad VO&#8217;s sound better, or at least not as bad as the worst. The only way we can combat our natural tendencies to grow complacent is to switch up the way we do things.</p>
<p>Also realize, the only people who survive in this business are the ones willing to scratch and claw their way to the top. The really hungry ones who refuse to take no for an answer are the ones that are going to outlast a lot of the rejection.Rejection is just part of the game. Voice over is acting. It&#8217;s as much acting as acting itself. The only difference is in today&#8217;s market there is very seldom an audience for a voice talent. When you had to go to a studio all the time to work in the business there was always some sort of audience. Even if it was just the producer and engineer. In New York City, almost every audition you go on has an audience. That is the beauty of the trend I mentioned at the very beginning; slowly but surely, the need to leave the house to audition is fading away. I doubt it will ever completely disappear. The big companies are not known for letting talents with their own studios run wild with projects for major advertisers. Still, if your studio is good enough and your reputation is such that a producer feels confident with the product you are going to supply, you&#8217;ll find that quite a few &#8220;Do it yourself&#8221; type productions are possible.</p>
<p>That is why I can&#8217;t stress enough the need for you to bone up on your audition skills, and make sure the product you are sending to clients is the best it can be.</p>
<p>Take a look around; see if there are ways to improve your product. Have you spent a lot of time sitting for your auditions? Well then stand up. Have you done a bunch of quick pass editing on your reads?<br />Then start to spend a little more time on them, or try reading each script three times and choosing the best of the bunch. Maybe you don&#8217;t know what the best is.. Drop the studio a note, we&#8217;ll tell you the difference.</p>
<p>Family can be a big problem. Not only are they noisy, but also you may not feel comfortable reading out loud with them in earshot. A lot of times family can be a real killer. If they don&#8217;t fully understand your pursuit, they are liable to bug you about it, or give you a hard time by making fun of you or mocking a read or voice you were trying to deliver. They don&#8217;t realize the effect they have on you. It&#8217;s the same thing about dieting. If you start to loose a little weight and go to a family function, in the same breath a family member is using to compliment you for your accomplishment, they say the words &#8220;Here, have a piece of pie.&#8221; or &#8220;Anyone for pizza?&#8221; I have heard a few people liken it to the family member being subconsciously jealous of you, and doing things to derail or sabotage your efforts. Without this turning into a Dr. Phil episode, or me turning you on your family, just know this: </p>
<p>For what ever reason, family members or people in the house are going to run the vacuum or decide to re-tile the kitchen 2 minutes after you sit down to read. They are just going to do it, and they will do it again and again. Until you make them understand. You have to sit them down and talk to them. You have to get the point across however you can, that you are trying to do one of the hardest, most un-natural things in the world, and you are trying to make a living at it. You need them to understand how their interruptions or disregard for what you are trying to do is making it impossible for you to do it. Once they understand, with a little practice and a few reminders, most family members will begin to get a little more understanding, and may even eventually turn into your biggest supporters.</p>
<p>If they continue to be obstructionists after you have tried to talk to them, then I think it gives some merit to the whole jealousy thing. If you find that having family members in the house makes it hard for you to really get into what you are doing, you are not alone. They bother me too. That is why the most private place you can find is the best. If there is no privacy, and you are afraid someone might hear you, you are just going to have to get over it. This is a performance art, and no actor ever got famous performing for his showerhead. You are going to have to learn how to belt this stuff out, even if someone might over hear you.</p>
<p>While we are on the family topic: Have you started reading your scripts while Johnny and Jenny pretend to have a WWF cage match in the background? If so, exercise the demons from them by giving them a book to read on the other side of the house or something. Oh.. One more thing.. Please turn your baby monitor off if you keep it in the &#8220;Studio&#8221;. We&#8217;ve had a couple of those too. You wouldn&#8217;t believe some of the stuff people send out&#8230;American Idol all over again. </p>
<p>Take a look at your surroundings in the studio. Anything that makes noise at your place is subject to sensitive ears when you send it out. The people that are listening to your work are usually sitting less than four feet from $1000 dollar monitors (speakers to all you American Idol and WWF fans) and they can hear your toenails growing. Sound isolation is a good hobby to study, or at least get some info on it if you want to land more work. </p>
<p>Take a serious look at your audio chain. What is (or isn&#8217;t) in the path of your signal? Do you have the most modest of setups, or do you have every piece of equipment known to man linked into your microphone. Towers of rack equipment burning in the background of your studio put off a ton of heat and noise. Locate them to a different room, or better yet unplug them and put them on Ebay. More often than not, producers are looking for good, clean, dry audio. No effects, no processing, no nothing. Now I know you &#8220;Radio Gods&#8221; will dispute that, and you have a valid point. Many producers hiring imaging voices are looking for fully produced audio, and you need that stuff to do your job. Many talents produce their own audio, that doesn&#8217;t in turn make them good producers. Production skills are learned either from a tutor or the hard way (years of trying to get it right on your own). </p>
<p>Beware the opinions of the audiophiles of the world. While they have many good points when it comes to the true fidelity of music, as applied to commercial voice work, a lot of the audio you produce with your $20,000 setup is headed for a $2 dollar Chinese made speaker. Knowing the difference is the real trick. Which leads me to one more way you can polish your product. Know which medium it&#8217;s headed for. If you have been hired to voice and produce a read for a website, there isn&#8217;t a lot of sense creating a masterwork better suited for THX and Skywalker Sound. Your file isn&#8217;t going to be playing in a movie theater; it&#8217;s going to by coming out of someone&#8217;s computer speakers at work. I have witnessed audio actually rumble a persons tinny little Dell speakers off their desk before.. There&#8217;s no need for it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve known a few VO&#8217;s who like to think of themselves (and only of themselves a lot of the time) as &#8220;Audiophiles&#8221;. Some of them in the not so distant past. They were very talented production people with very good ears. Unfortunately, their talent was only overshadowed by their own arrogance as to what qualified as &#8220;good sounding audio&#8221;. Many of them will paint themselves into esoteric little corners where the only production they&#8217;ll be doing is for the Boss Jock&#8217;s which litter the AM and FM dial. Sure, it&#8217;s good work if you get enough of it. But does it make you a voice talent? Maybe.. But what kind of voice talent? One that&#8217;s a one trick pony and hardly good at anything else? More than likely.</p>
<p>Sorry to break the news to you, radio imaging isn&#8217;t voice over. It&#8217;s a part of it. But it isn&#8217;t the real deal. It&#8217;s radio. Being able to say &#8220;The best hit music in all of Barbados&#8221; isn&#8217;t quite the same thing as carrying a 2-hour narration for the History Channel, the US Military, A&#38;E or Discovery. Producers who work for those companies steer very clear of anyone having a &#8220;Radio&#8221; or &#8220;Announcer&#8221; sound and last time I checked, imaging pays about $150 dollars a sheet, whereas narration and top shelf commercial talent can make $750 to $1500 for 10 seconds of their voice. Which one do you want to grow up to be? Auditions get posted daily with direction such as &#8220;Please no Announcers&#8221; and &#8220;Not looking for a radio guy, but a real person.&#8221; </p>
<p>Goes to show you that many of the people out there don&#8217;t consider &#8220;Radio Guys&#8221; real people. If you have ever worked in radio, which I did for four years, you know that in many cases it&#8217;s the truth. Many people in radio resemble anything but people. Maybe a certain part of a person&#8217;s body, but not people. Ok, I&#8217;ll stop the editorial. Wait a minute, it&#8217;s my opinion. I own it. Therefore I&#8217;ll do with it what I please. As opinions go, just like Radio Guys, everybody&#8217;s got one.</p>
<p>The trick to landing more gigs lies in your ability to satisfy the masses. Let the underdog businesses of the world get the same kind of audition that the big guys are getting. Don&#8217;t deliver a lame duck to some guy just because he is a small client. Give him the same product you would try to give Pepsi or McDonald&#8217;s and leave the bad auditions to the bad VO people out there. Strive to do your best with every chance you get. If you need some advise or don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;re doing the right thing. I&#8217;m always available to talk.</p>
<p>Take a look at the time of day you are auditioning and see if there is any way you can make it earlier. See if you can audition first thing in the morning, within four hours of getting up. It&#8217;s the time that your head is clear, your voice is most rested and there is little else going on in the world. If you work at night, or can only audition at night, try some nice hot tea when you sit down (or stand up) to read. Don&#8217;t make it one of the strong Black teas; try something a little more mild like green tea. If you can only audition in the mid day, make sure you clear all the left over Big Mac tidbits from your throat, drink some hot green tea, and try not to strain your voice in the early part of the day. If anyone out there has there own list of elixirs for the throat please share them here. I&#8217;ll post them on my site.</p>
<p>When I was in radio, I worked a split shift where I was out the door at 3:30 am and didn&#8217;t return until 10:30. Then I had to turn around and leave at 1:30pm and didn&#8217;t get back to the house until 8:30 at night. I was always tired, my auditions suffered, and overall I felt like I was loosing touch with the VO biz.. Solution: Leave radio.. That&#8217;s what I did. I never looked back.</p>
<p>Radio isn&#8217;t what it used to be. I don&#8217;t think it will ever be the same since the disrobing of Janet Jackson.There will be no more Howard Sterns, no more freedom to rattle off at the mouth as long as you don&#8217;t curse. It will all die off into a mere fraction of what it used to be. I had even more incentive to jump ship when I got a letter from my company (big company on the scale of Big) that said Congress and or Congress Jr. (the FCC) had passed an &#8220;Emergency Bill&#8221; that in effect said if I, little ol&#8217; me, so much as uttered something deemed indecent that I could be fined 14,000 dollars or some absurd amount of money. The company I worked for made it clear in the letter that they would immediately toss me in front of the bus in the event such a situation took place. That&#8217;s all I needed. I didn&#8217;t even clean out my pod, I just split. Left my posters on the wall and pictures of my family on the console.. I was gone.. I didn&#8217;t need it that bad, and radio wasn&#8217;t what I got into radio for. I got into radio to get more voice work. </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t call it a big mistake, because there were a lot of benefits to working an air shift for a while. You get in touch with a lot of different technologies and you spend a lot of time on the mic learning to get really comfortable with it being around. After a while, it kind of becomes your friend, you hold it, nurture it, talk to it&#8230;. Ok.. This is getting weird.. What I&#8217;m trying to say is there was nothing wrong with the experience. It&#8217;s just that very seldom does radio experience apply to freelance voice work when it comes to getting any. Yes, your opportunity to voice stuff for the local auto dealership or hair salon will come. Those opportunities only come because you are on the station. Leave the station and see if any of those clients call you when you are no longer affiliated with it. </p>
<p>There are guys that have been on my hometown station for over twenty years and I think I&#8217;ve heard them in maybe 20 spots apiece. And that is being generous. I&#8217;m sure there are lots of people out there gearing up to claim their days in radio launched their VO careers. Let me save them a minute.. Save it. Keep it to yourselves. The last thing I or anyone else will benefit from is someone coming by to blather on and on about their success. If you are a working talent and you think you owe it all to radio, good for you.. Your anecdotes are welcome if it is obvious that someone may benefit from them.</p>
<p>So you say &#8220;Hey Mike, you&#8217;re being rather hard on radio guys aren&#8217;t ya?&#8221; Well, yes&#8230;I am. Much like your parents might have told you not to touch the stove or that playing with matches was dangerous, I&#8217;m trying to keep potential VO&#8217;s from thinking that radio is the way to go to become a voice guy. Because it&#8217;s not. Let me make this clear delineation. If you want to be in radio, go to a broadcast school. I recommend the Connecticut Schools of Broadcasting, because that&#8217;s where I went and when I graduated, I sent out 2 emails and got hired 45 minutes after sending them out. If you want to be a voice over guy or girl, don&#8217;t go into radio. Don&#8217;t sign up for broadcast school, and one more thing&#8230; Don&#8217;t go into radio.. They are two different entities and need to be treated as such. If you do sign up for broadcast school, you will spend as much as you would trying to break into voice over. In that case the two are alike. From that point forward, they each take entirely different roads.</p>
<p>So you say &#8220;Hey Mike, (if you haven&#8217;t already called me a few things by now) don&#8217;t you think you are alienating people who are in radio and discouraging them from finding out more about voice over?&#8221; I was getting to that.</p>
<p>If you are in radio, and you think you want to get into VO as a freelancer, don&#8217;t give up all hope just because of me. I&#8217;m sure at some point some one told you &#8220;Hey, you&#8217;ve got a nice voice, you should be in radio.&#8221; to which you said, as you slid closer and ordered the little lady a drink, &#8220;Why yes, I should be.. and I am..&#8221; That right there is a radio guy. A voice over talent would say, &#8220;Thank you, I&#8217;m glad you noticed. I&#8217;ve been doing commercial voices for four years now.&#8221; &#8220;You might have heard me in the Betty&#8217;s Florist commercial which ran last month on cable channel 26.&#8221; (and is scheduled to run for another 10,000 years.) To which she nods &#8220;uh-huh&#8221; and then he proceeds to tell her about every other job he&#8217;s done to which she nod&#8217;s uh-huh. Then he runs out to the car to get her a copy of his demo tape. When he returns to hand it to her and asks if the company she works for hires voice talent, he finds her sitting huddled on her bar stool, looking at him as she sips her drink purchased by who? The radio guy. </p>
<p>That story I admit is an absolute embellishment, but not too far off from the way a desperate young voice talent might act when confronted with a new lead. It&#8217;s also similar to the way an aspiring radio guy or girl might act if they wanted to get into radio and they just met someone who worked at the local station. It wouldn&#8217;t even matter if all the guy did there was mop the floors, the thought would cross their mind. The feeling is the same, the desire and emotion to succeed at either is the same, though the roads one must take to do either are completely different. Radio is very &#8220;learn as you go.&#8221; You will get a check while you learn the ropes, although it&#8217;s a very meager check, you will get paid while you learn.</p>
<p>When you start out trying to do voice work, you will pay as you learn. You will pay a lot&#8230; and you can pay in many more ways than one. A few hours on the Internet should prove to you that there is no shortage of people with their hand out, offering to help you for a price. I am one of them. You&#8217;re best advised to take very careful steps when it comes to putting anything in any of those hands. The people who want to act, or do voice are a desperate lot when they get hungry. There are a great many people in &#8220;Internet land&#8221; as well as everywhere else waiting to prey upon that desperation. Hungry people will do a lot if they think it leads to food, or whatever it takes to satiate the palette for this stuff. A lot of talents will get hurt along the way and end up with nothing. Will it be their fault, or the fault of the people who offered to help them? More often than not, people&#8217;s nature when they fail is to blame others around them. It takes quite a bit of character for someone to turn the lens inward and see how they might have contributed to their own demise. When it comes to who&#8217;s at fault for a voice talent failing, it&#8217;s a mixture of both the teacher and the student on a lot of levels. </p>
<p>What a student has to do in every case is hold up their end of the bargain by practicing and following instructions. When the coach on the other hand appears to be the one who failed. The coach needs to sit back and ask why he ever took the student in the first place. Pardon while I &#8220;break Star Warsian&#8221; here, but Obi-Wan tried to teach Anakin the ways of the force on his own, without the guidance of Yoda. He failed his student and Anakin turned to the dark side. Even though Obi-Wan failed Anakin, you still end up liking Obi-Wan at the end of the movie and thinking he was a good man. That is Hollywood, now back to reality. </p>
<p>There is no Voice Over Yoda and the only force is the force you&#8217;d like to use on the person who took your money when you realize you&#8217;re not getting any work and you stink. When your coach fails you, or whomever you give your money to fails you in the real world, you are not going to like him and you certainly aren&#8217;t going to think he is a good man. Most times, it is the student who convinces himself or herself that the person has failed them because they haven&#8217;t succeeded in their venture. What that student also fails to realize many times, is that they took very few precautions when handing over their money to someone who was going to &#8220;make them a voice talent.&#8221; </p>
<p>So many times I have had potential talents show up on the doorstep, wanting me to do it for them; wanting me to make them into a voice talent. I try my hardest during their evaluation to scare them off. I tell them how hard it will be. I tell them how expensive it will be. I tell them how long it will take. I tell them that even with the training there is no guarantee they will get hired. I have even told talent that they would probably never be able to work in the commercial market, and would only be doing phone systems and cable spots for the rest of their lives. And they still wanted to go ahead with it. They would toss their money on the table and say, &#8220;OK, do you think you can make me a voice guy?&#8221; No matter how hard I tried, they just didn&#8217;t get it. It is at that point no coach should ever take a student. Because they are destined to fail, and will turn on the coach and spend the rest of their lives doing nothing except saying bad things about them. You cannot be made in this business. You have to make yourself.</p>
<p>Young talent, whether they come from radio or Radio Shack, are best advised to seek and gather all the information they can patiently, and not jump into anything right away. Make the soundest decisions you can based on the information you&#8217;re able to collect after an exhausting search. Every talent that has ever walked into my studio with stars in their eyes has had to listen to me say the same things you&#8217;ve read here. </p>
<p>Many people would have charged you for this type of advice. I put a lot of information out there for people without cost for two reasons:1. So that potential VO&#8217;s have more arrows in their quiver as they step out in search of learning how to &#8220;do this voodoo that we do so well.&#8221; (Thank you Harvey Korman and Mel Brooks)2. So that anyone considering paying a studio or demo producer a hunk of money can reflect on the information my studio provides and decide for themselves who can be trusted. </p>
<p>Shop around.. Caveat Emptor.. Go with your gut in everything you do.. I trust you&#8217;ll come to you own conclusions. I just hope they are the right ones. Have any doubts &#8211; just ask. I&#8217;ve been this candid here. I&#8217;m only more so in private.</p>
<p>As a side note, while I was writing this, an audition came in from a major national advertiser. By the time I had gotten to it, 70 some people had already auditioned for the job. It was easily one of those where you say &#8220;Ahh, there&#8217;s no way I get this. Look at how many people have sent in..&#8221; Which did cross my mind. I almost deleted it and moved on. But I went ahead and did it anyway.The next day they contacted me and said that there were some people who &#8220;kind of got it&#8221; but I hit it &#8220;spot on&#8221;. I got the gig, recorded the spot and was paid twice my talent fee because I did the work in my studio and they were so happy with the result. I found out a week later that the clients were blown away by the read. I&#8217;m not tooting my own horn here. This actually happened. The spot is up on my site http://www.michaelminetree.com under various reads. It&#8217;s the first one. Just goes to show you what a little practice, belief in your abilities, and some effort will do for you in this business. Have a great year everyone. I&#8217;ll see you on the air.</p>
<p>As always, if you have any questions, just ask&#8230;.Michael Minetree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2008/03/auditioning-for-voice-actors-in-the-new-era-the-best-way-to-ensure-more-bookings/5031/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convert DVD to Avi</title>
		<link>http://www.bigpoz.com/2007/10/convert-dvd-to-avi/4915</link>
		<comments>http://www.bigpoz.com/2007/10/convert-dvd-to-avi/4915#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Format Pal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Frame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bigpoz.com/2007/10/convert-dvd-to-avi/4915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ ...  />
<br />
Most of the software for converting DVD into AVI format is available at very reasonable rates - only professional video software like <b>Pinnacle</b> <b>studio</b> with extremely advanced functions and settings will set you back a few hundred dollars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today it is possible to convert DVD to AVI and also AVI to DVD format. These two tasks and many others can now even be performed with a single piece of video editing software.</p>
<p>AVI is a type of a video format which is commonly used today, and you can use a special piece of software called a DVD ripper to convert the AVI format into a DVD format with a single click.</p>
<p>Special Software for the Conversion</p>
<p>Most of the DVDs are high quality, and as a result of this are large in size. An average DVD can store 4GB of content. You can use special video software which converts the DVD content into an AVI <span id="more-4915"></span> or a MPG file with the same quality of the DVD but which takes up less space.</p>
<p>Software Has User Friendly Interface</p>
<p>Video software has a user friendly interface that will guide you through a step by step process of converting the DVD into AVI format. You should first insert the DVD into your DVD drive and then start the program. If DVD files are stored on the computer itself you can start ripping the files from the computer immediately.</p>
<p>Settings in Software</p>
<p>You can now make the relevant settings in the input setting dialog box as well as in the audio settings dialog box. In the output settings dialog box you can opt for settings as to whether to convert in AVI format or MPG format. You can even select the screen size, video format [PAL or NTSC], and audio quality level.</p>
<p>Compression Methods</p>
<p>Audio compression methods such as Lame MP3 can be used where the quality of sound is excellent and the size of the sound file is small. You can set the output settings in the export settings dialog box; you can also choose settings for display on widescreen monitors or normal monitors. Next is the setting for the max frame number. You can leave the other settings at their default value as these are mostly designed for use by professionals only.</p>
<p>Destination for Saving</p>
<p>You can then use the file menu to browse to the destination folder where you want the final AVI file to be saved. Then click on the record button and the process of conversion will begin. You can also use the conversion software to convert audio files from the DVD to MP# format or other formats such as FLV and MP4. The converted AVI files can then be save to your computer system or portable music player.</p>
<p>Use a Decryptor</p>
<p>You can also convert DVDs into small AVI files by using the split DVD option. Using this converts only the part of the DVD that you want to see. If an error occurs in converting into AVI format because of extra copyright protection, you can simply download a decryptor such as DVD decryptor and remove the protection.</p>
<p>Most of the software for converting DVD into AVI format is available at very reasonable rates &#8211; only professional video software like Pinnacle studio with extremely advanced functions and settings will set you back a few hundred dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bigpoz.com/2007/10/convert-dvd-to-avi/4915/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
